[zRPz]'>RAFTSMAN INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD v TEBB & ANOR 2020 (2) ZLR 879 (S)
Citation | 2020 (2) ZLR 879 (S) |
Case No | Judgment No. S-138-20 |
Court | Supreme Court, Harare |
Judge | Garwe JA, Mavangira JA & Bere JA |
Heard | 20 June 2019 |
Judgment | 22 October 2020 |
Counsel | T Zhuwarara, for the appellant |
Case Type | Civil appeal |
Annotations |
Flynote
Practice and procedure – affidavit – founding affidavit – what must be established by founding affidavit – founding affidavit defective – whether may be amended
Practice and procedure – pleadings – amendment – when allowed – defective founding affidavit – whether may be amended
The appellant issued summons against the respondents to set aside as invalid and irregular a surety mortgage bond, registered against its immovable property held under a deed of transfer. Pleadings were closed and the matter was ready for a pre-trial conference. Before a pre-trial conference was convened the appellant made an application to amend its summons and declaration. It sought to introduce a new additional prayer for the cancellation of another surety bond which it claimed was registered irregularly. The first respondent filed a counterclaim against the appellant for the payment of a loan, to which the appellant had stood as surety and co-principal debtor.
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.