WILLIAMS & ANOR v MSIPHA NO & ORS 2010 (2) ZLR 552 (H)
Citation | 2010 (2) ZLR 552 (H) |
Case No | Judgment No. S-22-10 |
Court | Supreme Court, Harare |
Judge | Chidyausiku CJ, Malaba DCJ, Cheda JA, Ziyambi JA& Garwe JA |
Heard | 4 June 2009 |
Judgment | 26 November 2010 |
Counsel | L Uriri, with him T Mpofu, for the applicants |
Case Type | Constitutional application |
Annotations | Link to case annotations |
Flynote
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 13 — protection of right to liberty — deprivation of liberty on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence — need for State to show that conduct alleged would constitute offence charged — only then can question be determined of whether facts give rise to reasonable suspicion
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 24(2) — application to refer allege breach of constitutional right to Supreme Court — only grounds on which such application may be refused — need to form opinion that application "frivolous" or "vexatious" — such an extraordinary remedy to be used only in clear and exceptional cases
Constitutional law — Constitution of Zimbabwe 1980 — Declaration of Rights — s 24(2) — application to refer allege breach of constitutional right to Supreme Court — Supreme Court's powers under subsection — court having power to make any order appropriate to secure or enforce impugned right-power includes grant of interlocutory relief or any other order which would prevent substantial prejudice and injustice pending resolution by the court of the constitutional issue — court's power to control its own process — includes power to prevent of execution of a judgment pending hearing of an application
Criminal law — offences under Criminal Law Code — s 37(1) (a) (i) — acting with intent to disturb the peace, security or order of the public — what provision is aiming at — provision not intended' to prevent public gatherings
Criminal procedure — remand — requirements for — need for court to be satisfied that facts alleged constitute offence charged — need for court to have reasonable suspicion that accused committed offence
Words and phrases — "frivolous" — "vexatious"
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.