1. ANTONIO v ASHANTI GOLDFIELDS ZIMBABWE LTD & ANOR; 2. Mujati v Ashanti Goldfields Zimbabwe Ltd & Anor; 3. Ashanti Goldfields Zimbabwe Ltd v Bonde 2009 (2) ZLR 372 (H)
Citation | 2009 (2) ZLR 372 (H) |
Case No | Judgment No. HH-135-09 |
Court | High Court, Harare |
Judge | Makarau JP |
Heard | 16 June 2009; 17 June 2009; 23 June 2009; 20 July 2009 |
Judgment | 18 November 2009 |
Counsel | G C Manyurureni, for Antonio and Bonde |
Case Type | Civil trials |
Annotations | No case annotations to date |
Flynote
Company – employee – evidence given by employee – need for employee to be suitably placed within structures of company to have knowledge of facts to which he deposes – employee not being so placed nor having such knowledge – effect of his evidence
Contract – formation – offer – what constitutes an offer – proposal intended to create binding legal relations and which so appears to the offered – what constitutes – need to consider terms of offer so as to determine how acceptance to be made – offer silent as to how it is to be accepted – how offer can be accepted – any conduct consistent with acceptance sufficient to create vinculum juris
Contract – option – offer by company to sell its houses to its employees residing therein on stipulated terms – such offer in effect an option, alternatively an irrevocable offer, by the company to sell its houses to its employees – offer accepted upon the signing of lease agreement or upon affecting rental payments in terms of the scheme.
Evidence – evidence given upon behalf of a company – employee giving evidence – need for employee to be suitably placed within government structures of company to have knowledge of the facts to which he deposes – employee not being so placed nor having such knowledge – effect of his evidence
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.