Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

NHUNDU v CHIOTA & ANOR 2007 (2) ZLR 163 (S)

2007 (2) ZLR p163

Citation

2007 (2) ZLR 163 (S)

Case No

Judgment No. S-28-07

Court

Supreme Court, Harare

Judge

Cheda JA, Ziyambi JA & Malaba JA

Heard

5 March 2007

Judgment

1 October 2007

Counsel

T E Mudambanuki, for the appellant
N Madya, for the respondent
No appearance for the second respondent

Case Type

Civil appeal

Annotations

Link to case annotations

Flynote

Contract — evidence — parol evidence rule — written contract — when parol evidence may be led — contract conditional upon the happening of an event which has not yet occurred — extrinsic evidence thereof not precluded — parol evidence led with the object of incorporating condition precedent into agreement so as to enforce condition not admissible

Evidence — parol evidence — when permissible to lead such evidence — integration rule — recorded terms of an integrated contract — rule prevents a party from altering the terms thereof in order to rely on the contract as altered

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.