S v DZVAIRO 2006 (1) ZLR 45 (S)
Citation | 2006 (1) ZLR 45 (H) |
Case No | Judgment No. HH-2-06 |
Court | High Court, Harare |
Judge | Patel J |
Heard | 28 October 2005; 11 November 2005; 13 December 2005 |
Judgment | 12 January 2006 |
Counsel | S Hwacha, for the applicants |
Case Type | Bail application |
Annotations | No case annotations to date |
Flynote
Criminal law (statutory offences) — Official Secrets Act [Chapter 11:09] — s 4(1)(d)(i) — essence of the offence — unauthorized disclosure of information obtained by official — motive for disclosure and prejudice to the State — irrelevance of
Criminal law (statutory offences) — Official Secrets Act [Chapter 11:09] — s 4(2) — communication of information prejudicial to Zimbabwe — communication of information which is already well known — such communication unlikely to prejudice the State — interest of the State as reflected in the policies of Government — anything which prejudices such policies is prejudicial to the State — "security of Zimbabwe" — meaning of — concept of very wide connotation — includes a broad range of matters embracing not just physical security but also the political economic and financial well being of the country
Criminal law (statutory offences) — Official Secrets Act [Chapter 11:09] — s 11 — Attorney-General's authority to prosecute — purpose of — authority given in respect of a contravention of s 4(2) but accused charged with contravening s 4(1) — whether proceedings vitiated — not every failure to comply with s 11 fatal
Criminal procedure — bail — application for bail after conviction — principles guiding such application — onus upon applicant to show why he should be granted bail — liberty of the individual must be balanced against the proper administration of justice.
Criminal procedure — plea — guilty — application to alter such plea to one of not guilty — principles guiding such application — accused must provide a reasonable explanation for change of plea — court should allow such application unless the explanation is positively false
Criminal procedure — plea — guilty — explanation of essential elements — consequences of failure to do so — whether failure grave enough to
Patel J
invalidate trial — detailed and elaborate admissions made by the applicants in agreed statements of fact — failure to explain adequately the elements of the offences not vitiating proceedings
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.