Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

ODENDAAL v INN ON THE RUPARARA 2006 (1) ZLR 1 (H)

2006 (1) ZLR p1

Citation

2006 (1) ZLR 1 (H)

Case No

Judgment No. HH-14-06

Court

High Court, Harare

Judge

Bhunu J

Heard

30 November 2005

Judgment

3 January 2006

Counsel

P C Paul, for the plaintiff
J C Andersen SC, for the defendant

Case Type

Civil trial

Annotations

No case annotations to date

Flynote

Delict — animal — actio de pauperie — requirements for — defences available — normally docile horse reacting to external stimulus — not acting contra naturam sui generis — voluntary assumption of risk by plaintiff — such defence is also available to the defendant

Practice and procedure — parties — substitution of — application for the substitution of one defendant to an action for another unrelated defendant — such application not competent — plaintiff should seek the joinder of the defendant or withdraw the proceedings altogether and start afresh, citing the correct defendant

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.