Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

S v TSVANGIRAI 2004 (2) ZLR 210 (S)

2004 (2) ZLR p210

Citation

2004 (2) ZLR 210 (S)

Case No

Judgment No. HH-169-04

Court

High Court, Harare

Judge

Garwe J & Assessors

Heard

3 February 2003; 26 February 2004

Judgment

15 October 2004

Counsel

B Patel, with him J Musakwa & M Nemadire, for the State
G Bizos SC, with him J C Andersen SC & E Matinenga, for the accused

Case Type

Criminal trial

Annotations

Link to case annotations

Flynote

Criminal law — common law crimes — high treason — requirements — evidence of conspiracy or incitement — must be at least one overt act or hostile intent — mere discussion not sufficient because there is no overt act or hostile intent

Criminal law — common law crimes — high treason — requirements — conspiracy — no conspiracy where one of conspirators merely pretending

Legal practitioner — conduct and ethics — prosecutor — duty of — to bring all relevant evidence before court –– relevant even if it does not support case for prosecution

Evidence — admissibility — video or audio tape — tape admissible as evidence even if part is inaudible, especially if accused accepts accuracy of audible parts

Evidence — witness — credibility — person standing to gain from his evidence cannot be considered credible

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.