Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

S v MAKHADO 1999 (1) ZLR 467 (H)

1999 (1) ZLR p467

Citation

1999 (1) ZLR 467 (H)

Case No

Judgment No. HH-94-99

Court

High Court, Harare

Judge

Gillespie J

Heard

2 June 1999

Judgment

2 June 1999

Counsel

Details not supplied

Case Type

Criminal review

Annotations

No case annotations to date

Flynote

Criminal procedure — admissions — what are — distinction between formal and informal admissions — what may be admitted — accused being asked by prosecutor to admit facts not relevant to charge — impropriety of allowing prosecutor to ask for multiple admissions

Criminal procedure — charge — particulars — of negligence — amendment — when may be made — not permitted when accused will be prejudiced — impropriety of conviction based on particular of negligence not charged

Criminal procedure — trial — conduct of — unrepresented accused — warning to be given to accused before being asked to make admission

Criminal procedure — trial — defence case — defence evidence — reliance on defence outline — prejudice caused by asking accused to adhere to defence outline

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.