MAVHEYA v MUTANGIRI & ORS 1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H)
Citation | 1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H) |
Case No | Judgment No. HH-173-97 |
Court | High Court, Harare |
Judge | Gillespie J |
Heard | 27 August 1997 |
Judgment | 12 November 1997 |
Counsel | A M Gijima, for the plaintiff |
Case Type | Court application |
Annotations | Link to case annotations |
Flynote
Damages — claim — illiquid claim for general damages — quantification of claim — how to be pleaded and proven — proof of — when court will make estimate of damages in the absence of proper proof of loss
Legal practitioner — admission — right of audience based on basis of degree from local university — adequacy of such qualification — conduct and ethics — duty to client — duty to exercise professional competence and diligence
Practice and procedure — summons — contents — must contain general statement of fact and of relief such as discloses cause of action — claim for general damages arising out of motor vehicle accident — lack of specificity in summons or declaration — application for default judgment refused — stale summons — when summons becomes stale — approach of court to stale summons — motion roll — set-down of incomplete cases will not be tolerated
This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.