Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

MAVHEYA v MUTANGIRI & ORS 1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H)

1997 (2) ZLR p462

Citation

1997 (2) ZLR 462 (H)

Case No

Judgment No. HH-173-97

Court

High Court, Harare

Judge

Gillespie J

Heard

27 August 1997

Judgment

12 November 1997

Counsel

A M Gijima, for the plaintiff
Defendant in default

Case Type

Court application

Annotations

Link to case annotations

Flynote

Damages — claim — illiquid claim for general damages — quantification of claim — how to be pleaded and proven — proof of — when court will make estimate of damages in the absence of proper proof of loss

Legal practitioner — admission — right of audience based on basis of degree from local university — adequacy of such qualification — conduct and ethics — duty to client — duty to exercise professional competence and diligence

Practice and procedure — summons — contents — must contain general statement of fact and of relief such as discloses cause of action — claim for general damages arising out of motor vehicle accident — lack of specificity in summons or declaration — application for default judgment refused — stale summons — when summons becomes stale — approach of court to stale summons — motion roll — set-down of incomplete cases will not be tolerated

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.