Search Search
Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

S v AITKEN 1992 (2) ZLR 463 (S)

1992 (2) ZLR p463

Citation

1992 (2) ZLR 463 (S)

Case No

Details not supplied

Court

Supreme Court, Harare

Judge

Gubbay CJ, Manyarara JA & Ebrahim JA

Heard

6, 13 August 1992

Judgment

18 August 1992

*

Counsel

JC Andersen SC for the appellant
RH Goba for the respondent

Case Type

Criminal appeal

Annotations

Link to case annotations

Flynote

Criminal procedure — bail — further application after some time had elapsed in terms of s 106(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 59] — application refused on basis of absence of fresh facts — appeal against refusal — whether passage of time fresh fact that court can take into account when dealing with further bail application

This section of the article is only available for our subscribers. Please click here to subscribe to a subscription plan to view this part of the article.